An explanation of the logic behind the 'H²O Generator' working title DWG (Deep Water Generator).

The diagrams of the DWG on this page are artist impressions created during the developement of the DWG idea and used to explain the concept and should not in anyway be viewed as anything but a brief outline.

Although the concept of the DWG is really straight forward, in as much as it uses known phenomena, the implementation of each component and the variance/balance that needs to be achieved to produce differing desired results is somewhat more complicated. It is for this reason that in this project outline we only explain the theory behind the project and it's initial components. In this way we might expect to achieve a number of workable solutions each with it's own merits.

It is envisaged that the DWG might become the basis for a number of different applications which is why the working title was changed to the 'H²O Generator'. Although the concept first came about from the notion of extracting the potential energy from deep water be it the oceans/seas or wells it was realised that the next generation might well utilise the DWG device to generate Hydrogen and Oxygen which could be recycled through the device as an additional power source.

The basis of the DWG initial concept is that the deeper the depth of water the higher the pressure, therefore the greater the potential energy. In a nut shell the first task of the DWG is to implement this potential energy by passing the pressurised water through a device without allowing the pressure to equalise on the low pressure side.

The DWG makes use of a number of commonly accepted principles:

1.That water vaporises at a lower temperature in low pressure environments.

2.That a vortex is created by rotational forces, given enough speed a low pressure environment is created at the centre.

3.That certain materials heat up when affected by electrical/magnetic fields.

The initial concept of the DWG is of a tornado of super heated water vapour in a tube. The task is to realise the optimum configuration that will allow the conversion of the pressurised water. The equation between the pressure, flow and energy produced is one of the first things that needs to be understood.The quantity and dimensions of the outlet coils being the crucial factors; the need to evacuate the water from the turbine in an efficient manner, avoiding the problems of restricted flow while keeping the bore of the coil as small as possible to increase the heating affect, the first thought being the more outlet coils the better, in fact the action would be one of suction rather than flow even to the possibility of the water being vaporized before it reaches the centre of the vortex.

Questions such as whether the device needs to be 'started' or if it is realistic to design something that will start from cold using a cascade effect (albeit a cascade that is upside down) stacking one device on top of another. The image of stacked devices includes a conical heat source which might be something as simple as a halogen lamp. The question is how much pressure would be required to achieve a state where the pressurised water can be transformed into a vortex of energy rich heated vapour. The aim is to achieve the generation of electricity and the production of super heated steam.

There are a number of obvious uses at this stage, electricity and magnetic fields have been generated, plus the water is now in a state where it can be removed while maintaining a lower pressure in the device. By feeding all surplus energy into the vortex of vapour to maintain this atmospheric model.

So now not only do we have a vortex of superheated steam we also have electricity and magnetic fields. Here in lies the possibility of the second stage of the DWG process that makes use of other commonly accepted principles.











The biggest argument against the success of the DWG 'H²O Generator' is shown in the diagram below. The second law of thermodynamics suggests that if you consider the red circle as an isolated system then the device would ultimately fail.

Whereas if you consider the green circle represents an open system then the water vapour only has to vent at the surface of the water for the action to be continuous. Maintain the state of the steam within the device and the steam will act as a battery delivering the accumulated energy to the surface, being lighter than air it has to rise. The more efficient one could make the turbine the better, yet any 'wasted' energy from mechanical friction would generate heat and the recycling of the heat from a heat exchanger as the device vents to atmosphere after it has been utilised would help the device to run hot.